Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health

: 2016  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 16--18

KPC with ESBL: A multistarrer tragedy

Dibyendu Banerjee1, Baishali Chakraborty2, Arpita Nandan3, Banya Chakraborty2,  
1 Department of Microbiology, Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
3 Department of Microbiology, Kalyani University, Kalyani, West Bengal, India

Correspondence Address:
Dibyendu Banerjee
27-H, Rajkrishna Street. Uttarpara, Hooghly - 712 258, West Bengal


Background: One of the most dangerous carbapenemase is Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase or KPC, possessing the ability to hydrolyze the Carbapenems, and other beta-lactams as well like Penecillins, Cephalosporins, and aztreonam. Many members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and few other non-fermenters contain the gene blaKPC, which codes for the enzyme KPC, and hence this is transferrable. Although the reports of KPC producers are scanty from India, it is still a dark cloud on the horizon, with the ability to overcast the sky. Our main aim was to identify KPC producing isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae in our Tertiary care Medical Institution. Materials and Methods: Over a 3 months period, we collected 54 isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae from different samples. We performed sensitivity against a variety of antibiotics including 3 Carbapenems , 3 extended spectrum Cephalosporins, and co-amoxyclav, both by disc diffusion and E-test against Ertapenem. Results: Out of 54 isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 38 (70.37%) showed resistance towards Ertapenem. Among these 38 isolates, 8 (14.81%) were found to be KPC producers. They were ESBL producers also. Conclusions: Ertapenem resistance is the most sensitive phenotypic marker for detecting KPC. Also, KPC shows resistance to the extended spectrum Cephalosporins. We found 38 isolates showing reduced susceptibility to Ertapenem (by MIC) - thus raising the chance of harbouring the enzyme. Truly, 8 among were confirmed as KPC and ESBL producers. All the microbiology laboratories should routinely search for KPC producers, using Ertapenem as a marker followed by confirmation with the three extended spectrum Cephalosporins.

How to cite this article:
Banerjee D, Chakraborty B, Nandan A, Chakraborty B. KPC with ESBL: A multistarrer tragedy.Ann Trop Med Public Health 2016;9:16-18

How to cite this URL:
Banerjee D, Chakraborty B, Nandan A, Chakraborty B. KPC with ESBL: A multistarrer tragedy. Ann Trop Med Public Health [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Sep 19 ];9:16-18
Available from:

Full Text


Resistance to broad spectrum antimicrobials, such as the extended-spectrum cephalosporins, is a well-recognized problem among Enterobacteriaceae. [1] Carbapenems have served as an important antimicrobial class for the treatment of these organisms and until recently, resistance to carbapenems was unknown among Enterobacteriaceae. However, the emergence of novel β-lactamases with direct carbapenem hydrolyzing activity has contributed to an increased prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). [2] CRE are particularly problematic, given the frequency with which Enterobacteriaceae cause infections, the high mortality associated with CRE infections, and the potential for widespread dissemination of Carbapenem resistance via mobile genetic elements. [3],[4],[5]

One of the most dangerous mechanisms of carbapenem resistance is by a novel enzyme - Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). KPC is an enzyme produced by certain bacteria that offer resistance to carbapenem antibiotics and other β-lactam antibiotics. KPC production occurs most commonly in the Enterobacteriaceae family, most commonly in Klebsiella pneumoniae, and also in K.oxytoca, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter spp, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp, and Serratia spp. The non-Enterobacteriaceae members producing this enzyme are Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, and Acinetobacter spp. [6]

KPC was first described in 2001 from a clinical isolate in North Carolina, USA. Sporadic occurrences have been reported from several states of USA. KPC-producing organisms contain the gene blaKPC that codes for production of a plasmid mediated β-lactamase. KPC hydrolyses the carbapenems (ertapenem, meropenem, and imipenem) destroying their activities. Thus, KPC can be considered as a threat due to its ability to render the β-lactam agents, including penicillin, cephalosporins, and aztreonam, ineffective as well. [6]

Our main purpose was to outline the sensitivity pattern toward carbapenems shown by Klebsiella as well as to detect the KPC producer, if any, among them in an apex medical institution. There are no new antibiotics at present to combat carbapenem resistance, and worldwide spread of the resistance gene is considered to be a potential nightmare.

 Materials and Methods

Fifty four different specimens of Klebsiella pneumoniae were collected over a 3-month period (June 2013 to August 2013) from samples of patients of all age groups. The samples giving growth of Klebsiella were urine (16 samples), pus (21), pleural fluid (2), sputum (11), debrided tissue (2), bone sequestrum (1), and central venous catheter tip (1). The species identification was done by biochemical testing. All the Klebsiella were subjected to Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method and also Stokes method for the determination of antibiotic sensitivity pattern following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. [7] The antibiotics taken were extended-spectrum cephalosporins [i.e., ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), and ceftazidime (30 μg)], imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ertapenem (10 mcg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and levofloxacin (10 μg). Then, the ertapenem-resistant isolates were subjected to ertapenem e-test for determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value (EM085 Ertapenem Ezy MIC Strip; Lot No: 0000169502). Double disc approximation test was also carried out with ceftazidime and cefotaxime, keeping co-amoxiclav in the middle to find our extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers as well.


Out of 54 Klebsiella isolates, organisms showing resistance toward ertapenem were 40 (77.78%) by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method.

With these 40 ertapenem-resistant isolates, e-test and modified Hodge test were performed. All of these 40 isolates yielded positive results by the modified Hodge test but 38 (70.37%) showed ertapenem resistance by the e-test. Among these 38 isolates, 8 (14.81%) showed resistance to all the 3 extended spectrum cepahalosporins, thus fulfilling the criteria of being a KPC producer.

These very eight isolates were interestingly found to be showing susceptibility to co-amoxiclav. That they were ESBL strains was confirmed by double disc approximation test.


We tested 54 isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae in this study. Imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem susceptibility were determined by disc diffusion as well as by e-test (to meropenem and ertapenem). Quality control was performed with Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853. Ertapenem resistance has been found to be most sensitive clinical test for KPC production and is recommended by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). [8] In two different studies, one involving 33 cases of KPC-producing Enterobacter spp. and the other involving 28 cases of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae determining the ertapenem MIC identified all the KPC producers correctly as ertapenem-resistant. [9] The modified Hodge test, although 100% sensitive for the detection of carbapenemase, is not a specific test to detect KPC production. [8] Still, we performed the test. However, we kept two conditions to be fulfilled to be a KPC producer: 1. a reduced susceptibility to ertapenem, preferably by e-test, and 2. resistance to all the three extended-spectrum cephalosporins.

Thirty eight isolates out of 54 showed reduced susceptibility to ertapenem and thus, raised the suspicion of harboring the KPC enzyme. Truly, eight of them were resistant to the entire three extended-spectrum cepahalosporins as well as ertapenem and could thus, be stamped as harboring KPC. Tragically, these eight isolates also met the CLSI ESBL criteria.

KPC-producing bacteria have been found across the world, posing challenges to clinicians. As they are not routinely identified by screening methods and as PCR is still a distant dream in many microbiology laboratories in our country, a way out should be made mandatory so as to routinely detect them and impose the necessary control measures. Clinical microbiology laboratories should be alert of ertapenem resistance as a signature marker for KPC production. Clinicians should, along the same lines, keep in mind that with increasing frequency of KPC producing bacteria, the number of effective antibiotics in hand are also on the wane.

The scenario we found was thus laden with severe consequences since these eight KPC producers were ESBL producers as well, thus taking away from us almost any possible therapeutic avenue.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1Jacoby GA, Munoz-Price LS. The new beta-lactamases. N Engl J Med 2005;352:380-91.
2Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, Horan TC, Sievert DM, Pollock DA, et al.; National Healthcare Safety Network Team; Participating NationalHealthcare Safety Network Facilities. NHSN annual update: Antimicrobial resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: Annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:996-1011.
3Bratu S, Landman D, Haag R, Recco R, Eramo A, Alam M, et al. Rapid spread of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in New York City: A new threat to our antibiotic armamentarium. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1430-5.
4Patel G, Huprikar S, Factor SH, Jenkins SG, Calfee DP. Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection and the impact of antimicrobial and adjunctive therapies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:1099-106.
5Schwaber MJ, Klarfeld-Lidji S, Navon-Venezia S, Schwartz D, Leavitt A, Carmeli Y. Predictors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae acquisition among hospitalized adults and effect of acquisition on mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:1028-33.
6Klebsiella pneimoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) Advisory: The Florida Department of Health is issuing this advisory to provide information and guidance for the recognition and control of infections caused by bacteria that produce Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), an emerging healthcare-associated group of pathogens.
7Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testings. Twenty-Fifth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S25, Vol. 35 No. 3. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2015. p. 44-50.
8Anderson KF, Lonsway DR, Rasheed JK, Biddle J, Jensen B, McDougal LK, et al. Evaluation of methods to identify the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:2723-25.
9Weisenberg SA, Morgan DJ, Espinal-Witter R, Larone DH. Clinical outcomes of patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae after treatment with imipenem or meropenem. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;64:233-5.