Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health
Home About us Ahead Of Print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Editorial Board Login 
Users Online:1338
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 20-23
Mechanisms of sulfadoxine pyrimethamine resistance and health implication in Plasmodium falciparum malaria: A mini review


Africa Health Research Organization, PO Box NT31 Accra New Town; and Viva Biomedical Institute PO Box AN6731 Accra-North, Ghana

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication10-Jun-2010
 

   Abstract 

Sulfadoxine pyrimethamine was adopted by most African countries based on the recommendation Roll Back Malaria. However, parasite resistant to the drug emerged quicker than Chloroquine resistant and it now becoming an alarming issue in Africa where the malaria burden is high. Although there are lot of studies on sulfadoxine pyrimethamine resistance (SPR), including the identification of the genes responsible for SPR, many question remained unanswered. In this mini review, recent advances of the mechanism of SPR and its impact on health in Africa is highlighted with emphasise on the role of mutation in SPR. It is no doubt that better understanding of SPR will eventually lead to more effective malaria control measures.

Keywords: Dihydrofolate reductase, dihydopteroate synthase, malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, sulfadoxine pyrimethamine, sulfadoxine pyrimethamine resistance

How to cite this article:
Yaro A. Mechanisms of sulfadoxine pyrimethamine resistance and health implication in Plasmodium falciparum malaria: A mini review. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2009;2:20-3

How to cite this URL:
Yaro A. Mechanisms of sulfadoxine pyrimethamine resistance and health implication in Plasmodium falciparum malaria: A mini review. Ann Trop Med Public Health [serial online] 2009 [cited 2019 Sep 17];2:20-3. Available from: http://www.atmph.org/text.asp?2009/2/1/20/64271

   Introduction Top


Malaria is one of the most important public health issues affecting humanity today.

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 500 million new malaria infections occur worldwide with 110 million cases of illness and almost 2 million deaths with 25% of childhood deaths in Africa are associated with malaria. [1] It is caused by four species of malaria parasite are Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, and P. malariae. Occasional infections with monkey parasites, such P. knowlesis, also occur.

Antimalarial chemotherapy remains the principal means of fighting malaria, yet current efforts are thwarted by the ever-increasing prevalence of drug-resistant Plasmodia.[3] The practice of malaria chemotherapy has been in operation over many centuries; however, currently we find ourselves with only handful of options for clinical utility. Resistance to all known antimalarial drugs, with the possible exception of artemisinin derivative, has been reported in several countries. [4] Increasing drug resistance has prompted several countries to change from Chloroquine (CQ) to other regimens as first-line treatment, usually with sulfadoxine pyrimethamine (SP), which is affordable, relative safe, and easy to administer.[5] However, resistance to SP was quick to develop in Southeast Asia, [6] while in Africa, SP resistance was low but just for some few years. [7] However, though late it has reached a critical level in some East and Central Africa, raising the fears of a potential public health disaster. [8],[9],[10],[11],[12]

This mini review summarizes recent advances in the understanding of SP resistance and its impact on the health management in Sub Saharan Africa where the burden of malaria is enormous.

SP and SP resistance (SPR)

SP is part of the class of antifolate combination drugs that acts through sequential and synergistic mechanism to block two key enzymes involved in folate synthesis.

Pyrimethamine inhibits the activity of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), while the sulfonamides and sulfones (in this case sulfadoxine) inhibit the activity of dihydopteroate synthase (DHPS). It is widely known as Fansidar; (Hoffman-La Roche) but is also sold in a variety of other commercial and generic forms. Sulfonamides were first found to be active against primate and bird malarias in the early 1940s and this activity was found to be reversed by p-amino benzoic acid (PABA), a substrate for DHPS. The basis of antimalarial activity of pyrimethamine is the ability to inhibit folate pathway based on their similar structure to pyrimidine derivative and the observation that folate antagonizes their action in vitro. The direct action of these compounds on malarial DHFR was later demonstrated. [13],[14] Unfortunately, resistance has emerged rapidly in settings were the drug was deployed [8],[9],[10],[11],[12] for example, in a study in north-eastern Tanzania, it was found that 45% of patients under the trial treated with SP failed to clear their parasitemia to below potency level on day 7. [38] Studies have shown that point mutations in the drug target confers resistance to SP. [15],[18],[19] It has been suggested that drug pharmacokinetic, cross-resistance between drugs, over usage of drugs, and inadequate treatment through inappropriate prescription or administration, non-compliance, or poor absorption play significant role in the emergence of resistance. [20],[21],[22],[23] In addition, the timing of the treatment in relation to initiation of an immune response has been hypothesized to have an important role in the development of resistance. Also, implicated are host immunity and level of transmission. [24],[25],[26]


   Mechanism of SPR Top


The molecular targets of each of the drug component are the thymidylate synthase (TS) enzyme for pyrimethamine and 7, 8-dihydro-6-hydroxymethylpterin pyrophosphokinase (PPPK) enzyme for sulfadoxine.[27],[28],[29] These two enzymes are important for the folic acid biosynthesis pathway. Research has shown that resistances to SP are associated with distinct point mutations in DHFR-TS and PPK-DHPS genes. A point mutation in DHFR gene causing a Ser→Asn at codon 108 of the DHFR domain has been implicated in resistance, [30],[31],[32] while high level in vitro resistance has shown that mutations at residue 51 resulting in Asn?Ile, 59 (Cys→Arg), and/or 164 (Ile?Leu) confer some level of resistance. [33],[34],[35] Initially, it was thought that resistance to pyrimethamine conferred resistant to cycloguanil automatically, but it was later shown that the two are not linked. [31] Some mutations in the DFHR gene may result in reduced affinity of DFHR for either pyrimethamine or the biguanide alone, while other results in reduced affinity got both drugs. None of the mutations associated with DHFR appear to affect the function of the enzyme adversely. As only a single- or double-step mutation is required to move from 'sensitivity' to 'resistance; the DHFR type of resistance occurs readily. [39]

With sulfadoxine, series of sequence analysis of the coding region of dihydropteroate synthase has identified a number of point mutations; all associated with in vitro resistance to sulfa drugs .The following mutations in the dihydropteroate synthase are associated with resistance to sulfadoxine based on in vitro analysis: an Ala→Gly mutation at codon 437 of the DHPS domain, while high levels of this drug component are associated with additional mutations at codon 581 (Ala→Gly), 436 (Ser→Phe), and 613 (Ala→Ser). [36],[37] Transfectional analysis in P. falciparum proved that dihydropteroate synthase mutations confer resistance to sulfonamides and sulfa drugs. [40],[41]


   Current Status of SPR in Africa Top


Studies has shown that P. falciparum sensitivity to SP has been increasing in the continent, especially in East Africa where SP has been on large scale use [43],[44],[45] and in some parts of West Africa. [46] Currently, the parasitological failure rate on day 7 of treatment is about 13% in Malawi where SP has been the first-line drug since 1993, [47] although another study reported that contrary to expectation, SP has retained good efficacy as first-line antimalarial drug in Malawi, [52] Tanzania, reported of about 50% failure rate at one site. [48] A recent study in Kenya showed that resistance to SP has reached high levels in many but not all areas, [49] while another study showed a low sensitivity rate of 62.7% for SP in the treatment of non-severe P. falciparum malaria in children in high-transmission area in Western Kenya.[50] A study to analyze treatment outcome in a randomized, double-blind trial with SP and chlorproguanil-dapson efficacy in treating uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in Malawian children, it was found that of the 84 pre-treatment samples of blood from patients with P. falciparum infection who were treated with SP, the clinical rate failure was high in the SP arm (20.1%) compared to the chlorproguanil-dapson arm (5.1%). This failure was attributed to mutation in the DHFR and DHPS genes. [51] In Gabon where SP and amodiaquine-artesunate (AQ/AS) have been adopted as first-line drugs, in trial to compare the efficacy of these combinations, it was reported that there was 26.1% treatment failures in the SP arm compared to 45.1% of the AQ arm. This means, SP is more efficacious than AQ while a multi-site study in Madagascar reported that antimalarial drug resistance (including SPR) remains low in CQR. [53]

More studies need to be undertaken in malaria endemic areas that have adopted SP as first-line drug regimen to really understand and evaluated factors that promote SPR.


   SPR Impact on Health Top


Malaria is a huge public health problem in Africa and with most African countries adopting SP as first-line regimen for the treatment of malaria infection, SPR results in enormous public health burden because of prolonged or recurrent sickness and progression to severe malaria which is associated with increased hospitalization and deaths. Resistance, even at lower levels will lead to recrudescence of malaria infection that is associated with return of disease, prolonged or worsening of anemia, and fuels the transmission rate. As a result, health facilities become overwhelmed. Both out- and in-patients cases increase beyond the normal health facilities capacity.

It also has direct impact of the productive labor force [42] and on public health expenditure; for example in Eritrea, the average cost of treating uncomplicated malaria is about 2.00 USD and about 7.00 USD for severe cases. [42],[54]


   Conclusion Top


Despite the extensive work been done on SPR, still more work needs to be done for understanding the molecular mechanism of combination mutations in the two genes: DHFR and DHPS; however, the factors promoting the development and transmission of these mutants are still to be elucidated. However, it is clear that these mutations can convert a clinical parasite from sensitive to resistant, although a universal marker of SP resistance has not been identified which will need collaborative network to achieve.

Drug resistance in human malaria infection is a major challenge and failure to understand the factors that contribute to resistance development and failure to understand the biological mechanism of resistance will have a devastating impact on our ability to deal with this life-threatening infection. This means that because most African countries have adopted SP as first-line regimen, therefore more studies need to be undertaken on factors that promote the SPR.

 
   References Top

1.Jean-Phillips, S. Malaria on http://www.malariatest.com/malaria.html (Accessed on 12/05/2008).  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Bruce-Chwatt L, Peters W. Chloroquine resistant plasmodium falciparum in Africa. Lancet 1997;11:1374-5.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.White NJ. The treatment of malaria. N Engl J Med 1996;335:800-6.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Bloland, P. Drug resistance in malaria. WHO Monograph WHO/CDS/CSR/DRS/2001.4. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Wernsdorfer WH. Epidemiology of drug resistance in malaria. Acta Trop 1994;56:143-56.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Thimasarn K, Pinichpongse S, Malikul S, Rooney W, Tansophalaks S. Phase III double-blind comparative study of Fansimef and Lariam for the curative treatment of Plasmodium falciparum infections in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1990;21:404-11.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Nwanyanwu OC, Ziba C, Kazembe P, Chitsulo L, Wirima JJ, Kumwenda N, et al. Efficacy of sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Malawian children under five years of age. Trop Med Int Health 1996;1:231-5.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Barat LM, Himonga B, Nkunika S, Ettling M, Ruebush TK, Kapelwa W, et al. A systematic approach to the development of a rational malaria treatment policy in Zambia. Trop Med Int Health 1998;3:535-42.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Bloland PB, Ettling M. Making malaria-treatment policy in the face of drug resistance. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1999;93:5-23.  Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Kamya MR, Bakyaita NN, Talisuna AO, Were WM, Staedke SG. Increasing antimalarial drug resistance in Uganda and revision of the national drug policy. Trop Med Int Health 2002;7:1031-41.   Back to cited text no. 10      
11.Mutabingwa T, Nzila A, Mberu E, Nduati E, Winstanley P, Hills E, et al. Chlorproguanil-dapsone for treatment of drug-resistant falciparum malaria in Tanzania. Lancet 2001;358:1218-23.  Back to cited text no. 11      
12.Talisuna AO, Langi P, Bakyaita N, Egwang T, Mutabingwa TK, Watkins W, Van Marck E, et al. Intensity of malaria transmission, antimalarial-drug use and resistance in Uganda: What is the relationship between these three factors? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2002;96:310-7.  Back to cited text no. 12      
13.Ferone R. Dihydrofolate reductase from pyrimethamine-resistant Plasmodium berghei. J Biol Chem 1970;245:850-4.  Back to cited text no. 13      
14.McCutchan TF, Welsh JA, Dame JB, Quakyi IA, Graves PM, Drake JC, et al. Mechanism of pyrimethamine resistance in recent isolates of Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1984;26:656-9.  Back to cited text no. 14      
15.Clyde DF, Shute GT. Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum in Tanganyika to pyrimethamine administered at weekly intervals. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1957;51:505-13.  Back to cited text no. 15      
16.Bruce Chwatt LJ. Chemotherapy of Malaria. Geneva Switzerland. World Health Organization.  Back to cited text no. 16      
17.Lobel HO, Campbell CC. Malaria prophylaxis and distribution of drug resistance. Clinics Tropical Medicine and Communicable Diseases 1986;1:225-42.  Back to cited text no. 17      
18.Triglia T, Menting JG, Wilson C, Cowman AF. Mutations in dihydropteroate synthase are responsible for sulfone and sulphonamide resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA 1997;94:13944-9.  Back to cited text no. 18      
19.Cowman AF, Morry MJ, Biggs BA, Cross GA, Foote SJ. et al. Mutations in dihydropteroate synthase are responsible for sulfone and sulfonamide resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988;85:9109-13.  Back to cited text no. 19      
20.Hastings IM, Watkins WM, White NJ. The evolution of drug-resistant malaria: the role of drug elimination half-life. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002;357:505-19.  Back to cited text no. 20      
21.Simpson JA, Watkins ER, Price RN, Aarons L, Kyle DE, White NJ. Mefloquine pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models: implications for dosing and resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:3414-24.  Back to cited text no. 21      
22.Iyer JK, Milhous WK, Cortese JF, Kublin JG, Plowe CV. Plasmodium falciparum cross-resistance between trimethoprim and pyrimethamine. Lancet 2001;358:1066-7.  Back to cited text no. 22      
23.White N. Antimalarial drug resistance and combination therapy. Phil Trans R Soc. London B Biol Sci 1999;41:1413-22.  Back to cited text no. 23      
24.Gatton ML, Hogarth W, Saul A. Time of treatment influences the appearance of drug-resistant parasites in Plasmodium falciparum infections. Parasitology 2001;123:537-46.  Back to cited text no. 24      
25.Sibley CH, Hyde JE, Sims PF, Plowe CV, Kublin JG, Mberu EK, et al. Pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: what next? Trends Parasitol 2001;17:582-8.  Back to cited text no. 25      
26.White NJ, Pongtavornpinyo W. The de novo selection of drug-resistant malaria parasites. Proc Biol Sci 2003;270:545-54.  Back to cited text no. 26      
27.Brooks DR, Wang P, Read M, Watkins WM, Sims PF, Hyde JE. Sequence variation of the hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase: Dihydropteroate synthase gene in lines of the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, with differing resistance to sulfadoxine. Eur J Biochem 1994;2:397-405.  Back to cited text no. 27      
28.Hyde JE. The dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthetase gene in the drug resistance of malaria parasites. Pharmacol Ther 1990;48:45-59.  Back to cited text no. 28      
29.Triglia T, Cowman AF. Primary structure and expression of the dihydropteroate synthetase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:7149-53.  Back to cited text no. 29      
30.Basco LK, de Pecoulas PE, Le Bras J, Wilson CM. Plasmodium falciparum: Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Cambodian isolates. Exp Parasitol 1996;82:97-103.  Back to cited text no. 30      
31.Foote SJ, Galatis D, Cowman AF. Amino acids in the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene of Plasmodium falciparum involved in cycloguanil resistance differ from those involved in pyrimethamine resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:3014-7.  Back to cited text no. 31      
32.Reeder JC, Rieckmann KH, Genton B, Lorry K, Wines B, Cowman AF. Point mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthetase genes and in vitro susceptibility to pyrimethamine and cycloguanil of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1996;55:209-13.  Back to cited text no. 32      
33.Sirawaraporn W, Sathitkul T, Sirawaraporn R, Yuthavong Y, Santi DV. Antifolate-resistant mutants of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:1124-9.  Back to cited text no. 33      
34.Sirawaraporn W, Prapunwattana P, Sirawaraporn R, Yuthavong Y, Santi DV. The dihydrofolate reductase domain of Plasmodium falciparum thymidylate synthase-dihydrofolate reductase: Gene synthesis, expression, and anti-folate resistant mutants. J Biol Chem 1993;268:21637-44.  Back to cited text no. 34      
35.Sirawaraporn W, Yongkiettrakul S, Sirawaraporn R, Yuthavong Y, Santi DV. Plasmodium falciparum: Asparagine mutant at residue 108 of dihydrofolate reductase is an optimal antifolate-resistant mutant. Exp Parasitol 1997;87:245-52.  Back to cited text no. 35      
36.Basco LK, Ringwald P. Molecular epidemiology of malaria in Yaounde, Cameroon II. Baseline frequency of point mutations in the dihydropteroate synthase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998;58:374-8.  Back to cited text no. 36      
37.Wang P, Brooks DR, Sims PF, Hyde JE. A mutation-specific PCR system to detect sequence variation in the dihydropteroate synthetase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1995;71:115-25.  Back to cited text no. 37      
38.Mutabingwa T, Nzila A, Mberu E, Nduati E, Winstanley P, Hills E, et al. Chlorproguanildapsone for the treatment of drug resistance falciparum malaria. Lancet 2001;358:1218-23.  Back to cited text no. 38      
39.White NJ. Antimalarial drug resistance: the pace quickens. J Antimicrob Chemother 1992;30:571-85.  Back to cited text no. 39      
40.Triglia T, Wang P, Sims PF, Hyde JE, Cowman AF. Allelic exchange at the endogenous genomic locus in Plasmodium falciparum proves the role of dihydropteroate synthase in sulfadoxine-resistant malaria. EMBO J 1998;17:3807-15.  Back to cited text no. 40      
41.Kublin JG, Dzinjalamala FK, Kamwendo DD, Malkin EM, Cortese JF, Martino LM, et al. Molecular markers for failure of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and chlorproguanil-dapsone treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J Infect Dis 2001;185:380-8.  Back to cited text no. 41      
42.National Malaria Control Programme (Ministry Health State of Eritrea). The Roll Back Malaria Core Indicators Survey. 2001.  Back to cited text no. 42      
43.Ogutu BR, Smoak BL, Nduati RW, Mbori-Ngacha DA, Mwathe F, Shanks GD. The efficacy of pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine (Fansidar) in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Kenyan children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2000;94:83-4.  Back to cited text no. 43      
44.Trigg JK, Mbwana H, Chambo O, Hills E, Watkins W, Curtis CF. Resistance to pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine in Plasmodium falciparum in 12 villages in north east Tanzania and a test of chlorproguanil/dapsone. Acta Trop 1997;63:185-9.  Back to cited text no. 44      
45.Rψnn AM, Msangeni HA, Mhina J, Wernsdorfer WH, Bygbjerg IC. High level of resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in children in Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1996;90:179-81.  Back to cited text no. 45      
46.Onyiorah E, van Hensbroek MB, Jah MS, Greenwood B. Early clinical failures after pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1996;90:307-8.  Back to cited text no. 46      
47.Kazembe P. The process of antimalarial drug policy change from Chloroquine to SP in Malawi, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.  Back to cited text no. 47      
48.Kitua A. Report of the Tanzania Ministry of Health Task Force on Antimalarial Drug Policy, World Health Organization, Geneva ,Switzerland, 2000.   Back to cited text no. 48      
49.East African Network for Monitoring Antimalarial Treatment. The efficacy of antimalarial monotherapy, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and Amodiaquine in east Africa: implications for sub-regional policy. Trop Med Int Health 2003;8:860-7.  Back to cited text no. 49      
50.Vreugdenhil CJ, Scheper FY, Hoogstraatte SR, Smolders M, Gikunda S, Cobelens FG, et al. Comparison of the parasitological efficacy of Amodiaquine and Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine in the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Bungoma District of Western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2004;71:537-41.  Back to cited text no. 50      
51.Kublin JG, Dzinjalamala FK, Kamwendo DD, Malkin EM, Cortese JF, Martino LM, et al. Molecular markers for failure of Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and Chlorproguanil-Dapsone Treatment of Plasmodium falciparum. J Infect Dis 2002;185:380-8.  Back to cited text no. 51      
52.Plowe CV, Kublin JG, Dzinjalamala FK, Kamwendo DS, Mukadam RA, Chimpeni P, et al. Sustained clinical efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Malawi after 10 years as first-line treatment: five year prospective study. BMJ 2004;328:545. Epub 2004 Feb 2.Click here to read.   Back to cited text no. 52      
53.Mιnard D, Ratsimbasoa A, Randrianarivelojosia M, Rabarijaona LP, Raharimalala L, Domarle O, et al. Assessment of the efficacy of antimalarial drugs recommended by the National Malaria Control Programme in Madagascar: Up-date baseline data from randomized and multi-site clinical trials. Malar J 2008;7:55.  Back to cited text no. 53      
54.Nsimba B, Guiyedi V, Mabika-Mamfoumbi M, Mourou-Mbina JR, Ngoungou E, Bouyou-Akotet M, et al. Sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine versus amodiaquine for treating uncomplicated childhood malaria in Gabon: a randomized trial to guide national policy. Malar J 2008;7:31.  Back to cited text no. 54      

Top
Correspondence Address:
Abubakar Yaro
Africa Health Research Organization, PO Box NT31 Accra New Town, Ghana, Viva Biomedical Institute PO Box AN6731 Accra-North
Ghana
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions



This article has been cited by
1 Efficacy of mefloquine intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy against schistosoma haematobium infection in Gabon: A nested randomized controlled assessor-blinded clinical trial
Basra, A. and Mombo-Ngoma, G. and Capan Melser, M. and Akerey Diop, D. and Würbel, H. and Mackanga, J.-R. and Fürstenau, M. and Manego Zoleko, R. and Adegnika, A.A. and Gonzalez, R. and Menendez, C. and Kremsner, P.G. and Ramharter, M.
Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2013; 56(6): e68-e75
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Mechanism of SPR
    Current Status o...
    SPR Impact on Health
    Conclusion
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5661    
    Printed203    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded59    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal