Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health
Home About us Ahead Of Print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Editorial Board Login 
Users Online:1565
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 511-513
Acute abdomen by gossypiboma


1 Department of Pathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India
2 Department of Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication27-Dec-2012
 

   Abstract 

Retained foreign bodies after surgery is a quite rare condition, which can have medico-legal consequences. Foreign bodies forgotten in the abdomen include towels, artery forceps, pieces of broken instruments or irrigation sets, and rubber tubes. The most common surgically retained foreign body is the laparotomy sponge. Such materials cause foreign body reaction in the surrounding tissue. The complications caused by these foreign bodies are well known, but cases are rarely published because of medico-legal implications. We report a case of 41-year-old female who was admitted with complaints of intestinal obstruction who had a previous history of hysterectomy performed 2 months back, at another hospital. Pathologists must be aware of this entity and its proper reporting, as the cases are liable to go to court. Surgeons must recognize the risk factors that lead to a gossypiboma and take measures to prevent it.

Keywords: Foreign body, gossypiboma, granuloma, sponge

How to cite this article:
Kataria SP, Garg M, Marwah S, Sethi D. Acute abdomen by gossypiboma. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2012;5:511-3

How to cite this URL:
Kataria SP, Garg M, Marwah S, Sethi D. Acute abdomen by gossypiboma. Ann Trop Med Public Health [serial online] 2012 [cited 2018 Aug 15];5:511-3. Available from: http://www.atmph.org/text.asp?2012/5/5/511/105147

   Introduction Top


Forgotten or missed foreign bodies, such as cotton sponges, gauze or instruments, after any surgical procedures are considered a misadventure and is associated with several legal problems. The term "gossypiboma" denotes a mass of cotton retained in the body after any intervention. [1] This term is derived from the Latin word Gossypium for "cotton" and the Swahili word boma for "a place of concealment." Other terms used for gossypiboma include "textiloma," "cottonoid," "cottonballoma," "muslinomas," or "gauzeoma." Gossypiboma was rarely reported in the literature and the reports of this technical oversight are the tip of an iceberg because the symptoms of gossypiboma are usually nonspecific and some patients remain asymptomatic and are never discovered or documentation is not enough in some diagnosed cases. Data concerning the incidence of gossypiboma tend to fluctuate and the incidence of gossypiboma is difficult to estimate because of a low reporting rate lest medico-legal implication. [2] It is estimated that gossypiboma may occur in 1 out of 300-1000 of all surgical interventions and 1 out of 1000-1500 of intraabdominal operations. [3]

While the date of the arising out of the first malpractice suit about gossypiboma was reported to be in 1933 in the medical literature, this date was reported to be as 1897 by some medical authors who researched court records and located judgments. [2] We report a case with retained gauze following hysterectomy done earlier. The mass effect of the sponge on the small gut along with lump in the abdomen warranted surgery; the case had an unusual presentation of intestinal obstruction.


   Case Report Top


A 41-year-old multiparous lady presented with pain in abdomen, nausea, and vomiting since 3 days and inability to pass stool and flatus since 2 days. The only positive clue in her history was an abdominal hysterectomy done 2 months back. All vital signs were normal. All routine investigations were within normal limits. Per-abdomen examination revealed distension. Radiology was inconclusive. Exploratory laparotomy revealed dense adhesions between the bowel loops. Gauze surrounded by omentum was removed and was followed by end-to-end anastomosis. Grossly, we received omentum densely adherent to gauze piece measuring 10 cm × 8 cm × 2 cm. Microscopically, the sections from omentum revealed extensive granulomatous inflammation with numerous multinucleated foreign body type of giant cells, fibrosis, and chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate comprising lymphocytes, few plasma cells, eosinophils, and macrophages. In the central portion, the whorled stripes of gauze fibers were also seen. The postoperative course was uneventful [Figure 1], [Figure 2] and [Figure 3].
Figure 1: Photograph showing the specimen of gossypiboma - gauze adherent to omentum

Click here to view
Figure 2: Photomicrograph showing granulomatous inflammation with giant cell reaction (H and E, 100×)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Photomicrograph showing giant cell reaction along with whorled stripes of gauze fibers (H and E, 200×)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Retained surgical sponge or gossypiboma in the abdominal cavity is an infrequent but serious surgical complication that may lead to medico-legal problems. The condition is often underestimated because case numbers are calculated only on the basis of malpractice claims. Another reason for nonreporting of occurrences is the fear of medico-legal repercussions. [4]

It is not easy to say whether cases of gauze left in the abdomen are always due to a real lack of quality on the part of the surgeon or of the theater nurse. Moreover, it has been reported that the interval between the probable causative operation and the diagnosis of retained gauze may range from 11 days to 28 years. [5]

Surgical sponges are made of cotton that does not stimulate any specific biochemical reaction except adhesion and granuloma formation. They may be a cause of an asymptomatic condition for a long time. The clinical presentation of gossypiboma may be acute or relatively delayed and depends on the location of the sponge and the type of reaction. There are two types of responses in pathology to foreign body: the first type is an exudative reaction leading to abscess or granuloma formation and usually leads to early detection and surgical removal; and the second type is delayed response manifesting as an aseptic fibrotic reaction to the material and development of a mass. [6],[7] In the present case, a foreign body granulomatous reaction was observed.

The diagnosis can be made by plain abdominal radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Computed tomography (CT) and MRI reveal comprehensive details about the mass in most cases. However, the CT findings of gossypiboma, particularly in long-standing cases, may be indistinguishable from intraabdominal abscess, since air bubbles and calcification of the cavity wall as well as contrast enhancement of the rim may be seen in both the conditions. Once gossypiboma is diagnosed, it should be removed. Surgery has been the mainstay in the removal of the foreign bodies for many years. However, some reports recommending alternative methods have recently appeared in the literature including percutaneous abscess drainage. [8],[9]

Besides many diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties, gossypiboma also carries some medico-legal implications. The presence of a foreign body inside the patient can be easily proven and the patient may litigate the responsible surgeon because this is an avoidable problem. Moreover, gossypiboma may be misdiagnosed as a malignant tumor and lead to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures or extensive extirpative surgery which may result in further complications. [8],[9] Further there are always questions as to whether this is a case of negligence or not; if a criminal charge has to be made out; whether any notification to the authorities is required; and lastly whose responsibility it is to inform the investigating agencies, the police or the medical council.

A study reported that emergency surgery, unplanned change in the operation, and body mass index were statistically significant risk factors for retained foreign bodies. Surgeons should place radiologically detectable sponges and towels in the surgical site, carefully consider the use of small sponges in large cavities, and perform a methodical wound examination each and every time before they begin to close the wound. New technologies like an electronic article surveillance system and bar coding are being developed that would hopefully decrease the incidence of negligence. [10],[11]


   Conclusion Top


Gossypiboma are uncommon, mostly asymptomatic, and hard to diagnose. They should be included in the differential diagnosis of the soft tissue masses with a history of prior operation. Patient-clinician interaction and compliance enhance the possibility of accurate diagnosis. This type of errors will probably never be completely abolished, but the incidence of retained surgical sponge can be reduced to a "minimum" by strict adherence to regulations, especially systematic and rigorous sponge count; this is particularly important during emergency procedures. Although human errors cannot be completely avoided, continuous medical training and strict adherence to rules of the operation room should reduce the incidence of gossypiboma to a minimum.

 
   References Top

1.Sharma D, Pratap A, Tandon A, Shukla RC, Shukla VK. Unconsidered cause of bowel obstruction-gossypiboma. Can J Surg 2008;51:E34-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Tarik U, Gokhan DM, Sunay YM, Mahmut A. The Medico-legal importance of Gossypiboma [Internet]. In: Abstract CD of Poster Presentations. Antalya, Turkey: 2009. p. 82-83. Available from: http://cbuadlitip4.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/1165-english.pdf [Last cited 2011 Feb 15].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Dakubo J, Clegg-Lamptey J, Hodasi W, Obaka H, Toboh H, Asempa W. An intra-abdominal gossypiboma. Ghana Med J 2009;43:43-5.   Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Asuquo ME, Ogbu N, Udosen J, Ekpo R, Agbor C, Ozinko M, et al. Acute abdomen from gossypiboma: A Case series and review of literature. Niger J Surg Res 2006;8:174-6.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Grassi N, Cipolla C, Torcivia A, Bottino A, Fiorentino E, Ficano L, et al. Trans-visceral migration of retained surgical gauze as a cause of intestinal obstruction: A case report. J Med Case Reports 2008;2:17.   Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Kim CK, Park BK, Ha H. Gossypiboma in abdomen and pelvis: MRI findings in four patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:814-7.   Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Kaiser CW, Friedman S, Spurling KP, Slowick T, Kaiser HA. The retained surgical sponge. Ann Surg 1996;224:79-84.   Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Gencosmanoglu R, Inceoglu R. An unusual cause of small bowel obstruction: Gossypiboma-case report. BMC Surg 2003;3:6.   Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Zbar AP, Agrawal A, Saeed IT, Utidjian MR. Gossypiboma revisited: A case report and review of the literature. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1998;43:417-8.   Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med 2003;348:229-35.   Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Aminian A. Gossypiboma: A case report. Cases J 2008;1:220.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Monika Garg
Department of Pathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak - 124 001, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1755-6783.105147

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1452    
    Printed77    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded10    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal