Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health
Home About us Ahead Of Print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Editorial Board Login 
Users Online:3328
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 160-164

Comparative evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification and conventional methods to diagnose extrapulmonary tuberculosis


Department of Microbiology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Prabir Kumar Ghosh
Dr Suresh Chandra Banerjee Road, Kolkata
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1755-6783.205563

Rights and Permissions

Background: Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis is difficult to diagnose by conventional methods, because they are less sensitive and more time consuming. Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) is a novel gene amplification method that has been developed to diagnose Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in pulmonary and paucibacillary extrapulmonary specimens even in resource poor settings. Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of LAMP to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in paucibacillary extra-pulmonary specimens and to compare the results with other conventional methods in extrapulmonary specimens. Materials and Methods: 45 specimens from suspected extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients were collected and tested by LAMP method after DNA extraction. Simultaneously, these specimens were tested by smear microscopy, solid and liquid culture methods. Culture positivity, either in solid or liquid culture, was considered as a confirmed case of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Results: Sensitivity of LAMP was 95.6% whereas for liquid culture, solid culture and smear microscopy were 69.6%, 65.2% and 17.4% respectively. Specificity for LAMP was 95.4% and for other 3 conventional methods were 100%. Positive predictive values, negative predictive values and likelihood ratios were also evaluated. Turn-around time (TAT) for LAMP was 8 hours only whereas for liquid culture was 2-4 weeks, and for solid culture it was 4-8 weeks. Conclusion: LAMP was a simple, rapid and cost-effective procedure with good sensitivity and specificity. It was found to be better than conventional methods to diagnose extrapulmonary tuberculosis.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1441    
    Printed36    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded19    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal