Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health
Home About us Ahead Of Print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Editorial Board Login 
Users Online:387
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 1627-1630
Comparison of muscular relaxation quality between the combination of remifentanil-atracurium and succinylcholine in rapid sequence induction and intubation


1 Department of Anesthesiology, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
2 Department of Anesthesiology, Valiasr Hospital, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication11-Jan-2018
 

   Abstract 


Introduction: Rapid sequence induction and intubationis the method of choice for anesthesia induction in nonfasted, full stomach patients in the operating room. The aim of rapid sequence induction is to quickly secure the airway to reduce the risk of regurgitation and aspiration of gastric contents. Succinylcholine, which is the most commonly used neuromuscular blocker in rapid sequence induction, has several side effects. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of succinylcholine and atracurium on muscular relaxation quality in rapid sequence induction and intubation. Materials and Methods: In this blinded, controlled clinical trial, seventy patients undergoing elective herniorrhaphy or orthopedic limb surgery randomly received one of the drug combinations, fentanyl/remifentanil/atracurium/nesdonal or fentanyl/nesdonal/succinylcholine and were evaluated for relaxation of the jaw muscles, vocal cord condition, and muscular response to intubation. Results: There was no significant difference in jaw relaxation, vocal cord condition, and muscular response to intubation between groups. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate were significantly lower in remifentanil-atracurium group compared to the succinylcholine group. Conclusion: Keeping the side effects of succinylcholine in mind, it seems that using remifentanil-atracurium combination for rapid sequence induction and intubation of the trachea produces results comparable to succinylcholine and consequently can be used as an alternative approach.

Keywords: Atracurium, rapid sequence induction, succinylcholine

How to cite this article:
Khalili M, Moshiri E, Modir H. Comparison of muscular relaxation quality between the combination of remifentanil-atracurium and succinylcholine in rapid sequence induction and intubation. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2017;10:1627-30

How to cite this URL:
Khalili M, Moshiri E, Modir H. Comparison of muscular relaxation quality between the combination of remifentanil-atracurium and succinylcholine in rapid sequence induction and intubation. Ann Trop Med Public Health [serial online] 2017 [cited 2018 May 21];10:1627-30. Available from: http://www.atmph.org/text.asp?2017/10/6/1627/222685



   Introduction Top


Endotracheal intubation in nonfasted patients is a risky procedure that is associated with the risk of regurgitation and aspiration of gastric contents and hypoxia. The selected method for tracheal intubation in these conditions is called rapid sequence induction and intubation. It aims to intubate the trachea and secure the airway as fast as possible to reduce the chance of regurgitation and aspiration of gastric contents. The procedure is used in emergency conditions when the patient's stomach is full or there is high risk for aspiration.[1] Due to its rapid action, succinylcholine is the most common neuromuscular blocker in rapid sequence induction method.[2] However, this drug has numerous side effects such as cardiac arrhythmias, increased intraocular pressure, increased intragastric pressure, muscle fasciculation, and muscle pain after the operation.[3],[4] In addition, succinylcholine administration is prohibited in patients with a family history of malignant hyperthermia. Atracurium is a nondepolarizing muscle relaxant drug. Clinical studies have shown that the drug has an average onset of action of about 3–5min. Its effects are cleared by anticholinesterase drugs and have few side effects.[5],[6],[7],[8] In emergency situataions when the patient with a full stomach is sent to the operating room as quickly as possible, lack of conciousness and disappearance of laryngeal reflexes following induction of anesthesia, if lasting too long can be associated with aspiration of gastric contents and death.[9]It seems logical to assess various pharmaceutical combinations to shorten the period of defenseless airway(i.e., the time span between the loss of consciousness until securing the airway using a tracheal tube). Yet, numerous studies searching for the ideal drug combination have failed to reach a consensus. Therefore, this study tries to compare two drug combinations of fentanyl+remifentanil+atracurium+thiopental with and fentanyl+thiopental+succinylcholine in terms of the quality of intubating conditions.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study was a double-blinded clinical trial. Seventy patients in the range of 15–65years old who were admitted for elective herniorrhaphy or orthopedic limb surgery were enrolled in the study. Other criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists ClassI or II, body mass index<26, and Mallampati score of I or II. Patients with a history of neuromuscular disease, family history of malignant hyperthermia or plasma cholinesterase deficiency, administration of known drugs that interfere with neuromuscular blockers, pregnancy, and history of allergy to the drugs used in this study were not included in the study.

The research proposal was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Arak University of Medical Sciences under the number of 3-90-112.

At first, demographic data were recorded, and 1min before induction of anesthesia, the patient's hemodynamic parameters including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were recorded and then patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received 1mcg/kg fentanyl, 1mcg/kg remifentanil, 0.5mg/kg atracurium, and finally 6mg/kg thiopental for induction of anesthesia. In the second group, 1mcg/kg fentanyl and then 6mg/kg thiopental and finally 1.5mg/kg succinylcholine were injected for induction of anesthesia. Then, 50 s after the injection of the last medication, the intubating person who was not informed of the group was assessed for muscle relaxation and laryngoscopy condition using Cooper scoring system[Table1]. Based on these criteria, total scores of 8 and 9 mean high scores, 6 and 7 mean good scores, 3–5 were relatively good, and 0-2 mean poor. The patient's hemodynamic parameters including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were also recorded 1min after tracheal intubation. Data obtained were analyzed usingthe statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics V20.0.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA)and t-independent and Chi-square tests.
Table 1: Cooper scoring system

Click here to view



   Results Top


Seventy patients were studied on the basis of inclusion criteria. The average age of the patients was 43.65±15.5 and 42.6±14years in the first and second groups, respectively. In terms of age, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups(P=0.766). In both groups, 22patients were male(62.9%) and 13 were female(37.1%) and there was no difference between groups in this regard(P=1.00). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of the weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate 1min before induction of anesthesia[Table2].
Table 2: Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate before intubation

Click here to view


In jaw relaxation score during intubation, 13patients scored 2 and 22patients scored 3 in the first group. In the second group, 10patients scored 2 and 25patients scored 3 in this regard. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding jaw relaxation(P=0.61).

In vocal cord situation, 11patients scored 2 and 24patients scored 3 in the first group. In the second group, 6patients scored 2 and 29patients scored 3. Again there was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding vocal cord situation(P=0.26).

In response to intubation in the first group, 10patients scored 2 and 25patients scored 3. In the second group, 1patient scored 1 and 8 whereas 26patients scored 2 and 3, respectively. Again, in this item, the groups were not statistically different(P=0.53). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between two groups in total score[Table3].
Table 3: Final score in intubation by two groups

Click here to view


Average systolic blood pressure before and after intubation in the first group showed a reduction of 8.06±0.85 mmHg and in the second group showed an increase of 9.12±2.68 mmHg. There was no significant difference between two groups(P=0.09). The mean diastolic blood pressure before and after intubation in the first group showed a decrease of 6.56±0.28 mmHg and in the second group showed an increase of 6.25±3.42 mmHg which was significant(P=0.044).

The average heart rate before and after intubation was another parameter that was evaluated in this study. Based on the results, the value in the first group increased by 40.38±37.42 bpm, and in the second group, it increased by 44.21±43.34 bpm which was not significantly different between two groups(P=0.561).


   Discussion Top


The results showed that, despite the use of two different types of muscle relaxants for rapid sequence induction and intubation, atracurium and succinylcholine had no significant difference in providing ideal intubating conditions. In this study like other studies to assess the overall score for intubation, three factors of jaw relaxation, vocal cord position, and the response to intubation were used(Cooper's scoring system). There was no difference in demographic and basic hemodynamic factors between our groups.

To date, there have been numerous studies in this area for comparison of succinylcholine and nondepolarizing muscle relaxants, yet most of the studies have compared rocuronium and succinylcholine. Due to the similar efficacy and family, we refer to studies on rocuronium.

Various studies comparing nondepolarizing muscle relaxants and succinylcholine have ended into controversial results. Some studies including this study showed no significant difference between two classes of medications in that none of them are superior to the other. Koh et al. stated that the duration of intubation using atracurium is similar to succinylcholine and no severe hemodynamic changes were observed with the use of these drugs in patients undergoing elective surgery.[10] The authors concluded that atracurium can be considered as a proper substitute for succinylcholine. On the other hand, Marsch et al., who investigated intubation in critically ill patients using rapid induction, stated that there is no difference between succinylcholine and rocuronium as muscle relaxants in terms of incidence and severity of decreased O2 saturation, quality of intubating conditions, and failed intubation.[11] Despite the above discussions, there are studies addressing the higher efficacy of succinylcholine compared to nondepolarizing muscle relaxants.

In the study by Vinik, although both drugs cause an appropriate muscle relaxation, the score of intubation in patients who received succinylcholine was higher than patients who received atracurium as muscle relaxant.[12] Although, in this study, a dose of received medications was identical and all patients were undergoing elective surgery, the results were not in line with our study.

The comparison of intubating conditions after rapid sequence induction using succinylcholine and rapacuronium showed that, after 50 s, clinically acceptable intubating conditions were achieved less frequently after rapacuronium 1.5mg/kg than after succinylcholine.[13] Furthermore, Mencke et al. stated that intubating conditions in succinylcholine group are significantly better than rocuronium group although there was no difference in airway adverse effects between two drugs.[14]

Yusuf et al. in a study conducted in 2006 compared suxamethonium and priming with atracurium for rapid sequence orotracheal intubation in ninety Nigerian adult patients. In their study, intubating conditions were significantly better in suxamethonium group compared to atracurium group both in terms of the time required for intubation and intubating conditions.[15]

Some studies suggest that the effect of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants is better than that of succinylcholine. Gyasi et al. showed that a single dose of atracurium (400 μg/kg) is ideal for intubation and maintaining muscle relaxation in minor surgeries although the onset of effect of this drug is slower than succinylcholine.[16] Sparr et al. also compared rocuronium and succinylcholine for rapid intubation in patients with elective surgery and found that, in the intubation by rapid induction technique, rocuronium is a suitable alternative to succinylcholine. Although he stated that the use of this drug in emergency conditions requires further studies.[17] In a recent study published by Reddy et al., it was found that the risk of anaphylaxis during anesthesia and surgery using succinylcholine is about ten times more than atracurium.[18]

In the study by McCourt, it was found that between 96% and 98% of the cases had high scores, i.e., good to excellent [1] and in the study by Vinik, about 98% of cases were rated good to excellent for intubation score.[12] In our study, 91.4%–94.2% of patients had good or excellent scores(Groups1 and 2, respectively).

One of the limitations of our study is the lack of measurement of intubation time in patients and comparison between two groups. On the other hand, using different doses of atracurium or other nondepolarizing neuromuscular agents might cause different results. Using a larger sample size and measuring pain and hoarseness after surgery could also add credibility to our study.


   Conclusion Top


Given the lack of significant difference between the variables measured in this study and also due to the effects of succinylcholine for intubation with rapid induction method, it seems that the use of remifentanil-atracurium combination has some characteristics comparable with succinylcholine and thus can be used as an alternative approach. On the other hand, there are conflicting studies comparing succinylcholine and nondepolarizing muscle relaxants indicating that further studies should be conducted using larger sample sizes and variable doses of the drugs.

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our thanks for moral and material support of Arak University of Medical Sciences and all anesthesia staff in Valiasr hospital.

Financial support and sponsorship

The researchers would like to thank the Deputy of Research of Arak University of Medical Sciences for assistance in developing this research.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
McCourtKC, SalmelaL, MirakhurRK, CarrollM, Mäkinen MT, KansanahoM, etal. Comparison of rocuronium and suxamethonium for use during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1998;53:867-71.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
BooijLH. Is succinylcholine appropriate or obsolete in the intensive care unit? Crit Care 2001;5:245-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
LeeC. Succinylcholine: Its past, present and future. In: KatzR, editor. Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs, Seminars in Anesthesia. Orlando: Grune and Stratton; 1984. p.293-302.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
DonatiF, BevanDR. Succinylcholine-Current status. In: NormanJ, editor. Neuromuscular Blockade Clinics in Anesthesiology. London: Saunders; 1985. p.371-85.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
StenlakeJB, WaighRD, UrwinJ, DewarGH, CokerGG. Atracurium: Conception and inception. Br J Anaesth 1983;55Suppl1:3S-10S.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
HughesR, PayneJP. Clinical assessment of atracurium using the single twitch and tetanic responses of the adductor pollicis muscles. Br J Anaesth 1983;55Suppl1:47S-52S.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
HughesR, ChappleDJ. The pharmacology of atracurium: Anew competitive neuromuscular blocking agent. Br J Anaesth 1981;53:31-44.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
BastaSJ, AliHH, SavareseJJ, SunderN, GionfriddoM, CloutierG, etal. Clinical pharmacology of atracurium besylate(BW 33A): Anew non-depolarizing muscle relaxant. Anesth Analg 1982;61:723-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
NjokuDB, LenoxWC. Use care when injecting rocuronium and thiopental for rapid sequence induction and tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1995;83:222.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
KohKF, ChenFG. Rapid tracheal intubation with atracurium: The timing principle. Can J Anaesth 1994;41:688-93.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
MarschSC, SteinerL, BucherE, ParggerH, SchumannM, AebiT, etal. Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: Aprospective, randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2011;15:R199.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
VinikHR. Intraocular pressure changes during rapid sequence induction and intubation: Acomparison of rocuronium, atracurium, and succinylcholine. JClin Anesth 1999;11:95-100.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
SparrHJ, MellinghoffH, BlobnerM, Nöldge-SchomburgG. Comparison of intubating conditions after rapacuronium(Org 9487) and succinylcholine following rapid sequence induction in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:537-41.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
MenckeT, KnollH, SchreiberJU, EchternachM, KleinS, Noeldge-SchomburgG, etal. Rocuronium is not associated with more vocal cord injuries than succinylcholine after rapid-sequence induction: Arandomized, prospective, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2006;102:943-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
YusufAH, OkekeCI, MerahNA, OlatosiJO, DesaluIS, KushimoOT, etal. Comparison of suxamethonium and priming with atracurium for rapid sequence orotracheal intubation in a Nigerian adult population. Niger Postgrad Med J 2006;13:313-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
GyasiHK, NaguibM, Adu-GyamfiY. Atracurium for short surgical procedures: Acomparison with succinylcholine. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985;32:613-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
SparrHJ, LugerTJ, HeideggerT, Putensen-HimmerG. Comparison of intubating conditions after rocuronium and suxamethonium following “rapid-sequence induction” with thiopentone in elective cases. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996;40:425-30.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
ReddyJI, CookePJ, van SchalkwykJM, HannamJA, FitzharrisP, MitchellSJ, etal. Anaphylaxis is more common with rocuronium and succinylcholine than with atracurium. Anesthesiology 2015;122:39-45.  Back to cited text no. 18
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Hesameddin Modir
Department of Anesthesiology, Valiasr Hospital, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ATMPH.ATMPH_554_17

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table1], [Table2], [Table3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed336    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal